🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities is set to be cut by more than half, following a divisive law change that required local governments to put the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils could only create a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time building local support and urging their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote backed Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of wards – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.