🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."